Executive Summary 9 - An Anatomy of Political Predation in Zimbabwe

Executive Summary of Research Paper 09

Michael Bratton and Eldred Masunungure, January 2011

This essay offers an interpretation of the rise and fall of Zimbabwe’s political economy through the lens of leadership.  

Of special interest are the actions of elite coalitions that link political parties, the state bureaucracy, and the security sector.  We argue that, over time, the civil-military coalition within Zimbabwe’s former ruling party placed its own political survival and welfare above broader developmental goals.  In consolidating state power, the rulers violently suppressed political opposition, engaged in predatory corruption, and challenged the economic interests of commercial farming and business elites.  In so doing, leaders undermined the rule of law and alienated the labor movement and civil society, which went on to form a rival opposition coalition.  

The paper also casts light on the limits of externally driven, hastily negotiated and reluctantly accepted political settlements.  At critical junctures in the country’s history – notably at independence in 1980 and a Global Political Agreement in 2008 – leaders entered compromise power-sharing arrangements.  Lacking strong leadership commitments, however, the rules underpinning political settlements in Zimbabwe never took root, thus inhibiting the country’s progress toward democracy and development.

About DLP

The Developmental Leadership Program (DLP) is an international research initiative that explores how leadership, power and political processes drive or block successful development.

DLP focuses on the crucial role of home-grown leaderships and coalitions in forging legitimate political settlements and institutions that promote developmental outcomes, such as sustainable growth, political stability and inclusive social development.

Find out more

News

New article - To Boldly Know: Knowledge, Peacekeeping and Remote Data Gathering in Conflict-Affected States

Thursday 12th October 2017

In this article in the Journal of International Peacekeeping, DLP researcher Suda Perera critically evaluates crowdsourcing's uses and abuses, and warns against an over-reliance on remotely gathered conflict data.

Read more

Why political settlements matter

Thursday 5th October 2017

Join us on 5 Oct 2017 at ODI (10-11:30am) to discuss the research featured in a special issue of The Journal of International Development co-edited by Alina Rocha Menocal (DLP and ODI) and Jan Pospisil (Political Settlements Research Programme at the University of Edinburgh).

Read more

Follow: @dlprog