What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

15th July 2015

The political settlements framework can seem a distraction to some practitioners, many of whom have been thinking and working politically about development for a number of years. They find the term difficult to define with any precision and, in any case, quite unnecessary. In the real world, progress towards better understanding of and engagement with the political conditions which help and hinder development has been ticking along nicely, independently of the academic debates.

‘We tried to get a clear understanding of exactly what we all understood by the term political settlements.’

Yet there are those who feel strongly that the settlements framework is invaluable. It brings into clearer focus, they say, the importance of elites, power and politics in the emergence –  or frustration – of locally legitimate institutions that promote development. For this group, the focus on political settlements is a timely and welcome aspect of a broader trend within development theory and practice. They feel it marks a greater engagement with, and a deeper understanding of, the political dynamics in developing countries. They see this as a prerequisite for effective progress on key development objectives.

Participants at the recent DLP political settlements workshop – a diverse group of development researchers, political scientists, donor agency staff and development practitioners – were aligned at various points on the spectrum between these two views. In the first session of the day we tried to get a clear understanding of exactly what we all understood the term ‘political settlements’ to mean. There was some consensus on a few key points:

  • Political settlements involve negotiation, bargaining and compromise between elites, and between elites and their respective groups of followers or constituents;
  • They are ongoing political processes rather than static agreements or deals;
  • Political settlements unfold at international, national and sub-national levels;
  • Settlements can be more or less inclusive of both elites and of wider social groups. The underlying causes of fragility and conflict can often be explained partly by reference to the exclusion or inclusion of particular elites or groups.

The sessions that followed highlighted two overarching lessons. First, that the settlements framework has undeniable explanatory and analytic value. Second, that the development community can use and apply a set of tools, principles and associated concepts which can be loosely grouped under the term ‘political settlements analysis’, without having overly rigid parameters for how to carry out that analysis. It was sufficient for us to start from a family of ideas and broad guiding concepts to engage in a productive and enlightening series of presentations, discussions and group exercises.

Development theorists and practitioners explained how they are already using the political settlements framework. Case studies from Somaliland, Myanmar, East Timor and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, among others, underscored for me the crucial value and importance of adopting a political settlements perspective in understanding and getting to grips with the social, political and economic obstacles to development.

We heard time and again and from a variety of perspectives how the performance of institutions and the prospects for inclusive economic growth and political stability are shaped by formal and informal power relations and negotiations among elites, and among elites and their respective groups of constituents. We heard how the political systems in fragile and conflict-affected countries are often characterised by exclusive political settlements.

'We were forced to confront the key challenge for any theoretical model – how do we convert it into practical recommendations for action.'

Perhaps the most engaging aspect of the workshop was a group exercise where we were presented with a case study of a fictional country and asked to hammer out how we would use a political settlements approach to get to grips with its development challenges. This was exceptionally thought-provoking: we were forced to confront the key challenge for any theoretical model – how do we convert it into practical recommendations for action? This issue is particularly thorny for the political settlements framework precisely because context is the key. Settlements analysis by its nature does not lend itself easily to rigid, pre-defined procedures.

My group did have some clear recommendations for our fictional aid program – we wanted to make trade easier and improve transport infrastructure. But we were also struck by the fact that we simply didn’t have enough information about the national, sub-national and international political context of our imaginary country to be able to construct a concrete picture of the way our aid program should unfold. Our group discussion, mindful of the significance of locally appropriate solutions to development challenges, signalled the fundamental importance of deep knowledge of domestic political conditions for a political settlements framework.

I came away from this session – and the workshop as a whole – feeling that it is important to avoid getting too bogged down in purely conceptual discussions around political settlements. Valuable though it is to have conceptual clarity, the emphasis now must surely be on establishing and embedding the day-to-day practices that follow from a politically-informed approach to development.

There is a rich body of research literature which adopts a politically-informed perspective to diagnose and understand the conditions for developmental progress. The DLP workshop – and the fictional programming exercise in particular – underscored the real challenge, to convert this work into operational guidelines for mainstream aid practices.

I’m sure I wasn’t alone in wishing that DLP’s founding Director of Research, the late Adrian Leftwich, could have been with us. As he was fond of saying, the acid test for assessing the value of any analytical tool is whether it helps us answer the question ‘What do we do on Monday?’.


See more posts on political settlements by researchers, policy-makers and practitioners

Image: Downtown Dili, East Timor. (Photo: Asian Development Bank)

0 Comments

Leave a comment

The views expressed in Opinions posts are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of DLP, the Australian Government or DLP's partner organisations.

Author

Edward Laws

Edward Laws

Edward Laws is a development theorist and political consultant who has written extensively on political settlements in fragile and conflict-affected areas. He has worked as a researcher with DLP, the D Academy and ODI.

Read more

Related items

Two remarkable transitions: lessons from Oman and Somaliland

Political settlements and international power structures

Opinion by Sarah Phillips20th July 2015
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal24th November 2014

What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

The value of the political settlements framework

Opinion by Edward Laws15th July 2015

International donors - aiding or abetting?

The 'donor's dilemma' is discussed in a new DLP paper.

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi10th September 2015

Developmental leadership: putting inclusiveness first

Inclusiveness should be the first step towards building more robust states.

Opinion by Seth D. Kaplan24th September 2015

Is developmental patrimonialism a dead end?

The first of two posts introducing a new DLP paper on growth and democratic transition

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th September 2016

Gender - the power relationship that Political Economy Analysis forgot?

Why more questions about gender relations could help

Opinion by Evie Browne13th February 2014

Politics, risk and development: three takeaways

Reflections from two conferences

Opinion by Chris Roche19th February 2016

What's in a name? Leadership as more than the 'big men' and 'big women' of history

Looking beyond 'The Leader' for a deeper understanding of how change happens

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver11th February 2014

Corruption: is the right message getting through?

The unintended consequences of raising awareness of corruption

Opinion by Caryn Peiffer12th August 2015
Opinion by Luke Arnold25th May 2016

Inequality – the politics behind the policies

Discussion starter for the #polinequality conference

Opinion by David Hudson11th February 2015

Gender analysis, and thinking and working politically – bridging the gap

Guest post on Devpolicy  introducing panels at this week's Australasian Aid Conference

Opinion by Chris Roche14th February 2017

Innovation: transactional or transformative?

Given the fascination with 'innovation' in the field of development, it's time to discuss what the word might mean.

Opinion by Chris Roche23rd March 2015

Is education a magic bullet for addressing corruption? Insights from Papua New Guinea

This post for Devpolicy unpacks the findings of a new Development Policy Centre / DLP paper 

Opinion by Grant Walton17th June 2015
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal26th April 2016

Overcoming premature evaluation

Guest post in From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th November 2016

Fiji's Roshika Deo - outlier, positive deviant or simply feisty feminist?

First in a series on 'Power, politics and positive deviance', theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Priya Chattier 1st February 2016

The road to transparency in resource-rich Myanmar

Myanmar's EITI process and its contribution to broader reform

Opinion by Taylor Brown1st April 2016

Politics shape services; and services shape politics

How governance and sector specialists can help each other understand the politics of service delivery

Opinion by Richard Batley19th June 2014

Forgotten South Sudan tangled in factionalism and failed politics

A toxic blend of complex historical identity politics and short-term elite politicking

Opinion by Jonathan Fisher4th September 2014

Developmental leaders, 'dirty hands', and the dark side of collaboration

The ambiguities of supporting 'developmental leadership'

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi11th December 2013

Medellin - more than a miracle

From the most murderous city on earth to 'a new global standard for urban policy': the politics of change in the wake of crisis

Opinion by Cheryl Stonehouse4th March 2014

Inclusive political settlements: who and what gets included, and how?

First of six posts on political settlements by researchers, policymakers and practitioners.

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal13th July 2015
Opinion by Susy Ndaruhutse11th September 2014

The challenge of realising Pacific democracies' development potential

How can Pacific democracies deliver for their citizens?

Opinion by Julien Barbara8th July 2016

Parliamentary strengthening: the IDC report

Having presented evidence to the UK's International Development Committee, what of the final report?

Opinion by Tam O'Neil9th February 2015

Welcome to DLP's blog

Welcome to DLP's new blog on politics, power, policy and developmental leadership

Opinion by Heather Marquette10th December 2013

Identifying rebels with a cause (and effect)

'Power, politics and positive deviance' is the theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Chris Roche1st December 2015

Do donors have realistic expectations of their staff when it comes to 'thinking and working politically'?

Is learning to ‘think politically’ like learning a new language? 

Opinion by Heather Marquette9th June 2014
Opinion by Dan Hymowitz3rd February 2017

Education, development, and the problem with consensus

Why rethink the international consensus on 'quality basic education for development'?

Opinion by Michele Schweisfurth7th April 2014
Opinion by Heather Marquette10th November 2014

Shuffling the decks: quick fixes versus long-term stability

Guest post for Development Progress on 'post-conflict' DRC

Opinion by Suda Perera22nd January 2015

Adding gender and power to the TWP agenda

Why bring gender into Thinking and Working Politically?

Opinion by Sally Moyle6th August 2015
Opinion by Heather Marquette9th March 2015

The politics of redistribution: we need you

Which are the key country cases? Help us shape new research.

Opinion by David Hudson16th October 2014

Taking the Results agenda to the next level?

On new book The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development

Opinion by Chris Roche15th July 2015

Indonesia and the political settlements trap

The challenges of 'resettling the settlement'

Opinion by Graham Teskey17th July 2015

Authoritarianism, democracy and development

What does the evidence say?

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th November 2014

Somaliland's route to peace

What can we learn from Somaliland's approach to peacebuilding? 

Opinion by Sarah Phillips12th December 2013

Politics - the problem and solution to poor services?

Why - and how - does politics trump everything else in service delivery?

Opinion by Claire Mcloughlin13th March 2014

Cancer and the links between medicine and development

Guest post for From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2015

Security and justice – the mismatch between policy and practice

What hinders more politically nuanced security and justice programming?

Opinion by Shivit Bakrania21st July 2014
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal29th March 2016

The inclusiveness test: making change work

Guest post for openDemocracy

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal4th November 2015

Political analysis as the practical art of the possible

Bringing politics back into PEA - a new paper with Adrian Leftwich

Opinion by David Hudson24th July 2014

It's all about inclusion, but how?

Guest post for the World Bank

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal6th April 2016