The politics of redistribution: we need you

16th October 2014

'In every country, the history of inequality is political – and chaotic.'
Thomas Piketty (2014: 288)

Which countries have witnessed the most interesting or important episodes of redistribution? What were the politics behind these episodes? We want to know what you think. We're looking for good ideas, good cases, and collaborators.

Inequality in Fiji Take a look at this collection of inequality plots. Zoom in on the cases – which catch your eye?

How do you explain Cameroon since 1996, Fiji since 1991, Morocco 1975-1990, Thailand 1995-2001, or Zambia 1993-2002? Or, for that matter, Sweden in the 1930s? These are all sustained episodes of reduced income inequality.

Our focus is not the policies that redistributed wealth from the relatively rich to the relatively poor. It is the politics that made the policies possible.

Today – as part of Oxfam's 'Let's talk about inequality' blog action day – we want to start a conversation about the politics of redistribution.

If inequality isn't inevitable, how can it be addressed? We think the answer is politics: political mobilisation, organisation and leadership creating pressures for change.

Thomas Piketty's Capital shows that rising income inequality is a central feature of unmanaged capitalism, likely to produce crises unless governments actively intervene to reduce inequality.

What does this mean for developing countries? Gabriel Demombynes has done a nice job extrapolating from Piketty's theory and gnomic utterances.

We approach this from a slightly different angle – one that Duncan Green came up with. What evidence do we have on how politics can, or better still, has moderated rising inequality? How do leaders and coalitions organise to create pressures for change? What is the role of power, ideas, coalitions, and critical junctures?

In Duncan's words, Piketty 'has no suggestion for how to overcome the collective action problems and political capture that would block any attempt [to tackle inequality and redistribute wealth] ... politics/how change happens is not his strong suit (he endorses it in theory, but it's just not his thing)'.

Piketty rejects any kind of 'economic determinism', saying that 'the history of the distribution of wealth has always been deeply political' (Piketty 2014: 20). Democratic politics and progressive policies can reduce the negative dynamics of wealth distribution – and they have done so. But the question of how societies can lower inequality has produced few concrete answers. Surprisingly, it has received little attention.

DLP's new research project, The Politics of Redistribution, aims to help fill this gap by examining cases where countries have successfully lowered inequality for a sustained period of time (see our first attempt to think this through).

We plan to continue that conversation in depth at DLP's annual conference next February on the broader issue of the politics of inequality (see here for the call for papers).

We look to the likes of Merilee Grindle, Marcus Melo, Njuguna Ng'ethe, and James Manor, and William Ascher for inspiration. These authors emphasise that reform success is often shaped by how leaders and reformists strategically engage with supporters and opponents to reduce resistance to reforms.

They can, for example, design initiatives that do not foster alarm or opposition; or create incentives and disincentives to convince other actors to support or tolerate reforms; or even distract opponents by downplaying proposed policies or publicising other issues that matter more to them.

In every case, the key is to astutely build coalitions – sometimes among unlikely partners – to promote change. Successful political leaders carefully tested the space available to them to pursue specific pro-poor policies and identified the constraints they faced from domestic and international sources.

Of course, there is no magic bullet, no easy route to redistribution that lowers inequality. Periods during which this happens may be triggered by some highly disruptive shock or crisis. Creating the political capital needed to build successful coalitions may require some unsavoury alliances. And solving one problem can create another. For example, in Malaysia affirmative action policies that lowered inequality have produced tensions between ethnic groups. It's important to acknowledge and address these trade-offs and the realities of the political settlement from the outset.

So, let's talk about the politics of reducing inequality. Which countries have witnessed the most interesting or important episodes of redistribution? What were the politics behind these episodes? Let us know by commenting below this blog post or using the hashtag #politicsredis on twitter. Thank you.

 

Photo: Jed Sullivan

1 Comments

1.

Bala Raju Nikku

26th October 2014 at 03:03

Thank you, we are interested in collaborating with you. As you are aware caste, class, ethnicity, geography are some of the factors that lead to inequality in Nepal. The Maoist revolution in some ways is an out come of centuries of inequality by the Ranas and Shah kings and the ruling elite. But now a country without a monarchy and rewriting its constitution with an ambition to reduce inequalities can be an interesting case study for your ongoing research.

Leave a comment

The views expressed in Opinions posts are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of DLP, the Australian Government or DLP's partner organisations.

Documents

Author

David Hudson

David Hudson

Dr David Hudson is a Senior Lecturer in Political Economy in the Department of Political Science at University College London (UCL). His main research interests lie in the political economy of development: public engagement with global poverty, the international political economy of development finance, and the politics of development.

Read more

Author

Niheer Dasandi

Niheer Dasandi

Niheer is a Research Fellow with the Developmental Leadership Program, based at UCL. His research focuses on politics and development, particularly on the political economy of aid, links between inequality and poverty, the process of policy reform, and political-bureaucratic interactions.

Read more

Related items

Taking the Results agenda to the next level?

On new book The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development

Opinion by Chris Roche15th July 2015

Identifying rebels with a cause (and effect)

'Power, politics and positive deviance' is the theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Chris Roche1st December 2015

Medellin - more than a miracle

From the most murderous city on earth to 'a new global standard for urban policy': the politics of change in the wake of crisis

Opinion by Cheryl Stonehouse4th March 2014

Parliamentary strengthening: the IDC report

Having presented evidence to the UK's International Development Committee, what of the final report?

Opinion by Tam O'Neil9th February 2015

Fiji's Roshika Deo - outlier, positive deviant or simply feisty feminist?

First in a series on 'Power, politics and positive deviance', theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Priya Chattier 1st February 2016

Politics - the problem and solution to poor services?

Why - and how - does politics trump everything else in service delivery?

Opinion by Claire Mcloughlin13th March 2014

What's in a name? Leadership as more than the 'big men' and 'big women' of history

Looking beyond 'The Leader' for a deeper understanding of how change happens

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver11th February 2014

Welcome to DLP's blog

Welcome to DLP's new blog on politics, power, policy and developmental leadership

Opinion by Heather Marquette10th December 2013

Politics shape services; and services shape politics

How governance and sector specialists can help each other understand the politics of service delivery

Opinion by Richard Batley19th June 2014
Opinion by Dan Hymowitz3rd February 2017

What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

The value of the political settlements framework

Opinion by Edward Laws15th July 2015

Developmental leaders, 'dirty hands', and the dark side of collaboration

The ambiguities of supporting 'developmental leadership'

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi11th December 2013

Adding gender and power to the TWP agenda

Why bring gender into Thinking and Working Politically?

Opinion by Sally Moyle6th August 2015

Two remarkable transitions: lessons from Oman and Somaliland

Political settlements and international power structures

Opinion by Sarah Phillips20th July 2015

Politics, risk and development: three takeaways

Reflections from two conferences

Opinion by Chris Roche19th February 2016

The politics of redistribution: we need you

Which are the key country cases? Help us shape new research.

Opinion by David Hudson16th October 2014
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal24th November 2014

Cancer and the links between medicine and development

Guest post for From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2015

Inequality – the politics behind the policies

Discussion starter for the #polinequality conference

Opinion by David Hudson11th February 2015

Gender - the power relationship that Political Economy Analysis forgot?

Why more questions about gender relations could help

Opinion by Evie Browne13th February 2014

Climate change and adaptation in the Pacific Islands: watering down women's security?

How women leaders are challenging a narrow adaptation agenda.

Opinion by Nicole George7th March 2014

Somaliland's route to peace

What can we learn from Somaliland's approach to peacebuilding? 

Opinion by Sarah Phillips12th December 2013

Political analysis as the practical art of the possible

Bringing politics back into PEA - a new paper with Adrian Leftwich

Opinion by David Hudson24th July 2014

It's all about inclusion, but how?

Guest post for the World Bank

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal6th April 2016

Forgotten South Sudan tangled in factionalism and failed politics

A toxic blend of complex historical identity politics and short-term elite politicking

Opinion by Jonathan Fisher4th September 2014

Is developmental patrimonialism a dead end?

The first of two posts introducing a new DLP paper on growth and democratic transition

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th September 2016