Politics - the problem and solution to poor services?

13th March 2014

One of the most influential and enduring World Development Reports ever produced – Making Services Work for Poor People – is a decade old this year.

I was among those celebrating this milestone at the World Bank last month. Aside from the thought-provoking discussions we had about the past, present and future of aid to service delivery, I was personally struck by some of the human stories behind its creation.

In particular, I was (some might say naively) surprised to find out that one of its most challenging chapters nearly didn't make the final cut.

The author of the chapter on political accountability (Shekhar Shah) recalled how the Bank's legal department originally resisted its foray into the historically off-limits territory of politics.

Permission was finally given only on condition the WDR team would 'stand alone' in the face of any political fallout.

To my mind at least, only good came from this minor victory. The chapter remains the go-to analysis for understanding why politicians so often don't deliver on their promises, why decent quality services remain mostly elusive, and why citizens are usually powerless to do anything about it. All these issues are equally relevant today as they were then. Of course, as it turned out, the Bank's funders were reportedly enthralled by this new realism.

Ten years on, thinking seems to have graduated from 'does politics matter'? to 'does politics trump everything else in service delivery'? (the title of one session at the anniversary conference). The answer on both counts: an emphatic 'yes'.

This begs the deeper question of why, and for practitioners looking for tangible entry points, how. Specifics aside, the palpable consensus among conference participants was this: rather than casting politics as exclusively a problem – or disruption to the normal function of policy – we should consider it inherent to the everyday machinations of societies. More importantly, we should see it as part of the solution to the persistent problem of poor service delivery.

...politics can lurch from enabling to constraining pro-poor delivery, sometimes in the blink of an eye

But how exactly is politics both the problem and the solution? Can it be both at the same time? Apparently so. In fact, we heard lots of examples of how politics can lurch from enabling to constraining pro-poor delivery, sometimes in the blink of an eye.

Take the case of Bihar, where political leaders have been instrumental in scaling up programmes to improve the quality of education. Nevertheless, come election time, even these progressive minds turned their attention to more visible projects that could be targeted at specific groups and were more likely to generate greater electoral returns.

It seems clear that politics is better at producing some forms of 'progress' than others. Expansions in access to basic services, whether it be in health, education or water, seem more achievable, politically, than improvements in quality. The explanation lies at least partly in the characteristics of these two very different objectives.

Understanding where politics sits along this enabling-constraining continuum, and its potential to move from one to the other (and back again), may be key.

Addressing quality is complex, can challenge union interests, and produces slow, gradual improvements less easily observed by voters than, say, highly visible infrastructure. In contrast, access speaks well to a political narrative of entitlement and is unlikely to encounter resistance where it can extend political spheres of influence or scope for clientelism.

So politics can both enable and constrain. This is why no-one would dispute it's difficult to characterise – let alone generalise – the effects of politics on service delivery in any given environment. Still, there's something progressive and measured about moving beyond thinking of politics as the problem, to politics as the solution. It opens up the possibility of learning from the politics of what works as well as the politics of failed reforms.

Subtle as the semantics may seem, this line of enquiry also implies a slightly different orientation for aid agencies: not how they can work around politics, or even avoid it, but how they can work through it. Understanding where politics sits along this enabling-constraining continuum, and its potential to move from one to the other (and back again), may be key.

One thing the insightful anniversary conference illustrated for me was that politics – if by which we mean what issues are legitimately up for discussion and negotiation – is moveable, and it can come a long way in a decade.


Image: Women fill water cans in North Darfur. Albert González Farran / UNAMID

0 Comments

Leave a comment

The views expressed in Opinions posts are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of DLP, the Australian Government or DLP's partner organisations.

Documents

Author

Claire Mcloughlin

Claire Mcloughlin

Claire is a senior researcher with DLP and GSDRC, based at the University of Birmingham's International Development Department. Her research focuses on the politics of basic services and their effects on state-building processes. She is currently researching the relationship between service provision and state legitimation in conflict-affected situations.

Read more

Related items

The challenge of realising Pacific democracies' development potential

How can Pacific democracies deliver for their citizens?

Opinion by Julien Barbara8th July 2016

Inequality – the politics behind the policies

Discussion starter for the #polinequality conference

Opinion by David Hudson11th February 2015
Opinion by Susy Ndaruhutse11th September 2014

Politics shape services; and services shape politics

How governance and sector specialists can help each other understand the politics of service delivery

Opinion by Richard Batley19th June 2014

What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

The value of the political settlements framework

Opinion by Edward Laws15th July 2015

Forgotten South Sudan tangled in factionalism and failed politics

A toxic blend of complex historical identity politics and short-term elite politicking

Opinion by Jonathan Fisher4th September 2014

Cancer and the links between medicine and development

Guest post for From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2015

The politics of redistribution: we need you

Which are the key country cases? Help us shape new research.

Opinion by David Hudson16th October 2014

Education, development, and the problem with consensus

Why rethink the international consensus on 'quality basic education for development'?

Opinion by Michele Schweisfurth7th April 2014

Developmental leadership: putting inclusiveness first

Inclusiveness should be the first step towards building more robust states.

Opinion by Seth D. Kaplan24th September 2015

Welcome to DLP's blog

Welcome to DLP's new blog on politics, power, policy and developmental leadership

Opinion by Heather Marquette10th December 2013

Is developmental patrimonialism a dead end?

The first of two posts introducing a new DLP paper on growth and democratic transition

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th September 2016

Politics - the problem and solution to poor services?

Why - and how - does politics trump everything else in service delivery?

Opinion by Claire Mcloughlin13th March 2014

Parliamentary strengthening: the IDC report

Having presented evidence to the UK's International Development Committee, what of the final report?

Opinion by Tam O'Neil9th February 2015

Taking the Results agenda to the next level?

On new book The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development

Opinion by Chris Roche15th July 2015

It's all about inclusion, but how?

Guest post for the World Bank

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal6th April 2016

What's in a name? Leadership as more than the 'big men' and 'big women' of history

Looking beyond 'The Leader' for a deeper understanding of how change happens

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver11th February 2014

Inclusive political settlements: who and what gets included, and how?

First of six posts on political settlements by researchers, policymakers and practitioners.

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal13th July 2015

Developmental leaders, 'dirty hands', and the dark side of collaboration

The ambiguities of supporting 'developmental leadership'

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi11th December 2013

Politics, risk and development: three takeaways

Reflections from two conferences

Opinion by Chris Roche19th February 2016

Somaliland's route to peace

What can we learn from Somaliland's approach to peacebuilding? 

Opinion by Sarah Phillips12th December 2013

Political analysis as the practical art of the possible

Bringing politics back into PEA - a new paper with Adrian Leftwich

Opinion by David Hudson24th July 2014

Gender - the power relationship that Political Economy Analysis forgot?

Why more questions about gender relations could help

Opinion by Evie Browne13th February 2014

Fiji's Roshika Deo - outlier, positive deviant or simply feisty feminist?

First in a series on 'Power, politics and positive deviance', theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Priya Chattier 1st February 2016

Security and justice – the mismatch between policy and practice

What hinders more politically nuanced security and justice programming?

Opinion by Shivit Bakrania21st July 2014

The inclusiveness test: making change work

Guest post for openDemocracy

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal4th November 2015
Opinion by Caryn Peiffer7th December 2016

Medellin - more than a miracle

From the most murderous city on earth to 'a new global standard for urban policy': the politics of change in the wake of crisis

Opinion by Cheryl Stonehouse4th March 2014
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal24th November 2014