Politics, risk and development: three takeaways

19th February 2016

Last week was a big one for the Australasian development community, particularly for those interested in the politics of development. The Australasian Aid Conference at the Australian National University (10-11 February) included a packed session on 'Putting political thinking into development practice'. And DLP’s Annual Conference at La Trobe University focused  on Power, Politics and Positive Deviance.

For those who listened closely, in between the boilerplates of government policy there were genuinely exciting possibilities in Peter Varghese’s opening address at the AAC. He outlined a vision of effective development work as “art, rather than science”. He also emphasised the importance of taking an approach that is deeply rooted in the local political context. Which is why it was so good to hear him peel back the technological veneer of innovation debates, highlighting the role of programming innovation

So what does thinking about politics and risk in a different way entail? We took three things away from the week’s events.

1. Learn better from the politically informed work already happening

DLP conference 2016Initiatives that are locally owned and driven, tailored to context and that take issues of power and politics into account are already making a real difference in our region, and in Indigenous Australia.

We need to learn more and learn better from ongoing practice. And we need to recognise that these initiatives are often driven by individuals, organisations or coalitions who use unusual or unorthodox strategies in pursuit of their goals. They sometimes bend or break the rules or, at the very least, play games within the rules. Poor and marginalised groups often use distinctive political strategies that are shaped by the constraints and risks they face.

International support can assist these processes, but too often it can depoliticise locally driven action, or even provoke backlash and increase the risks faced by less powerful groups.

AAC session on 'Putting political thinking into development practice

AAC session on 'Putting political thinking into development practice'

2. Use analysis tools on ourselves to help adapt our organisational systems and cultures

It was also clear that when practitioners in development agencies try to work more flexibly and politically to support such programs better, they often come up against bureaucratic and administrative hurdles. This has been well documented by a number of authors. Obstacles arise from the political economy in which aid organisations find themselves – sensitivity to foreign political interventionism is one example that Carothers and de Gramont note. And obstacles also arise from internal power relations. So as we use the tools of political, gender and power analysis, we need to remember to look inwards as well as outwards. If we want agencies and other organisations to experiment and take more judicious, considered risks, we need to encourage this process.

3. Make the story about shared goals, not foreign aid

Finally, it is important to shift the focus of the development sector’s main narrative from foreign assistance to the universality promoted by the Sustainable Development Goals. As Richard Moore, the Former Deputy Director General, AusAID, put it, “there are two things wrong with the term 'Foreign Aid’: ‘Foreign’ and ‘Aid'.” We need to make clear that, if we are to survive as a species, international cooperation must enable us to learn together about how we can collectively address the common problems we face.

To develop this alternative story, we can build on a range of current research into public attitudes that is challenging conventional wisdom. As we do so, we will need to recognise the importance of politics and politicians as well as the importance of ideas in shifting norms and policies.

Main image: A business owner, Vanuatu (Connor Ashleigh / AusAID); Second image: DLP conference 2016.


Leave a comment

The views expressed in Opinions posts are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of DLP, the Australian Government or DLP's partner organisations.



Chris Roche

Chris Roche

Chris is Associate Professor and Chair in International Development at La Trobe University in Melbourne, where he is also Director of the Institute for Human Security and Social Change. He is DLP's Senior Research Partner, and he has over 25 years’ experience working for international NGOs as a project manager, evaluator, policy researcher and director.

Read more


David Hudson

David Hudson

Dr David Hudson is a Senior Lecturer in Political Economy in the Department of Political Science at University College London (UCL). His main research interests lie in the political economy of development: public engagement with global poverty, the international political economy of development finance, and the politics of development.

Read more

Related items

Neither 'good guys' nor 'bad guys': Positive engagement with armed groups

Final post in a series on 'Power, politics and positive deviance', theme of DLP's 2016 Annual Conference.

Opinion by Suda Perera5th February 2016

Is developmental patrimonialism a dead end?

The first of two posts introducing a new DLP paper on growth and democratic transition

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th September 2016

Forgotten South Sudan tangled in factionalism and failed politics

A toxic blend of complex historical identity politics and short-term elite politicking

Opinion by Jonathan Fisher4th September 2014

The politics of redistribution: we need you

Which are the key country cases? Help us shape new research.

Opinion by David Hudson16th October 2014

Developmental leaders, 'dirty hands', and the dark side of collaboration

The ambiguities of supporting 'developmental leadership'

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi11th December 2013

Security and justice – the mismatch between policy and practice

What hinders more politically nuanced security and justice programming?

Opinion by Shivit Bakrania21st July 2014

Do donors have realistic expectations of their staff when it comes to 'thinking and working politically'?

Is learning to ‘think politically’ like learning a new language? 

Opinion by Heather Marquette9th June 2014

International donors - aiding or abetting?

The 'donor's dilemma' is discussed in a new DLP paper.

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi10th September 2015

Gender analysis, and thinking and working politically – bridging the gap

Guest post on Devpolicy  introducing panels at this week's Australasian Aid Conference

Opinion by Chris Roche14th February 2017

Innovation: transactional or transformative?

Given the fascination with 'innovation' in the field of development, it's time to discuss what the word might mean.

Opinion by Chris Roche23rd March 2015

Medellin - more than a miracle

From the most murderous city on earth to 'a new global standard for urban policy': the politics of change in the wake of crisis

Opinion by Cheryl Stonehouse4th March 2014
Opinion by Heather Marquette10th November 2014

Cancer and the links between medicine and development

Guest post for From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2015

Politics - the problem and solution to poor services?

Why - and how - does politics trump everything else in service delivery?

Opinion by Claire Mcloughlin13th March 2014

Fiji's Roshika Deo - outlier, positive deviant or simply feisty feminist?

First in a series on 'Power, politics and positive deviance', theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Priya Chattier 1st February 2016

What's in a name? Leadership as more than the 'big men' and 'big women' of history

Looking beyond 'The Leader' for a deeper understanding of how change happens

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver11th February 2014
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal29th March 2016

It's all about inclusion, but how?

Guest post for the World Bank

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal6th April 2016

What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

The value of the political settlements framework

Opinion by Edward Laws15th July 2015

Adding gender and power to the TWP agenda

Why bring gender into Thinking and Working Politically?

Opinion by Sally Moyle6th August 2015

Taking the Results agenda to the next level?

On new book The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development

Opinion by Chris Roche15th July 2015

Inequality – the politics behind the policies

Discussion starter for the #polinequality conference

Opinion by David Hudson11th February 2015

Political analysis as the practical art of the possible

Bringing politics back into PEA - a new paper with Adrian Leftwich

Opinion by David Hudson24th July 2014
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal24th November 2014

Politics shape services; and services shape politics

How governance and sector specialists can help each other understand the politics of service delivery

Opinion by Richard Batley19th June 2014

Welcome to DLP's blog

Welcome to DLP's new blog on politics, power, policy and developmental leadership

Opinion by Heather Marquette10th December 2013

Identifying rebels with a cause (and effect)

'Power, politics and positive deviance' is the theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Chris Roche1st December 2015
Opinion by Dan Hymowitz3rd February 2017

Politics, risk and development: three takeaways

Reflections from two conferences

Opinion by Chris Roche19th February 2016

Gender - the power relationship that Political Economy Analysis forgot?

Why more questions about gender relations could help

Opinion by Evie Browne13th February 2014

Somaliland's route to peace

What can we learn from Somaliland's approach to peacebuilding? 

Opinion by Sarah Phillips12th December 2013