More room for politics in the inequality debate?

24th June 2015

This month at DLP our focus is largely on corruption as we prepare for a collaborative event in London discussing 'Corruption and development'. Yet we could hardly fail to notice that inequality, a hot topic since Pikettymania and the theme of our conference earlier in the year, has resurfaced with a vengeance.

The IMF report of 15 June, Causes and consequences of income inequality, has a stark key message: “When the rich get richer, benefits do not trickle down.” In May the OECD published its own take on inequality, In it together: why less inequality benefits allAnd earlier this month the Ford Foundation, one of the most influential philanthropy institutions in the world, announced that all its funding would be channelled towards redressing inequality. 

Here’s a taste of it, from the OECD (PDF, 1.7 MB):

“Some may consider that the social and political costs of high and rising inequality are in and of themselves sufficient to justify action. The central argument of this publication is different. It is that, beyond its serious impact on social cohesion, high and often growing inequality raises major economic concerns, not just for the low earners themselves but for the wider health and sustainability of our economies. Put simply: rising inequality is bad for long-term growth.”

Absolutely. We agree with all of this. But crucially, as always, we’re concerned by the how; how inequality is rising and how it can be reversed. Our contention is that this often involves politics.

Given this recent push on inequality, I enjoyed returning to a recording of our star-studded roundtable at The Politics of Inequality conference to hear from the panellists.

Inequality is on the agenda; the politics of inequality isn’t. Yet.

As Ricardo Fuentes-Nieva observed: “A few years ago it was really impossible to talk about this topic of inequality and that has changed.” Explaining inequality has become a mainstream trend and high-level political processes have reflected this. But Ricardo also asked what this meant for the distribution of formal and informal power. Yes, inequality is on the agenda, but the mainstream debates still remain pretty much silent on the role of politics as a process.

Sam Hickey posed the “wider problem”, the suggestion that the way forward is to go with the grain and push ideals such as accountability to the back of the queue. Yet a social justice approach informed by rights-based thinking cannot accept the eternal postponement of democracy and accountability in the name of getting things done.

But there are encouraging signs from both the IMF and OECD that politics and fairness are beginning to get some elbow room in the debate. Alongside its many charts and GDP statistics, the IMF also says:

“High and sustained levels of inequality, especially inequality of opportunity can entail large social costs … [and] undermine individuals’ educational and occupational choices. [It gives] an incentive to divert their efforts toward securing favored treatment and protection, resulting in resource misallocation, corruption and nepotism … citizens can lose confidence in institutions, eroding social cohesion and confidence in the future.”

"there are encouraging signs ... that politics and fairness are beginning to get some elbow room in the debate."

The OECD report hammers home the point that when 40% of people control of just 3% of total wealth, this puts more beyond their reach than a nice house and some savings: it deprives them of the kind of human capital investment that might improve opportunities for them and their children, give them more choices and better quality of life; education, training, good quality housing, health.

So while, on the face of it, the primary message of both these new reports appears to be an economic one, both strongly echo the ‘inequality of politics’ messages that were the focus of our conference roundtable.

Here are a few more issues to mull over.

Inequality is anti-democratic.

As Sam Hickey put it: “High levels of inequality lead to and enable the capture of public institutions around the rules of the game.” Similarly, the OECD report says, bluntly, that concentration of wealth leads to rent-seeking and economic and institutional capture, even in ostensibly democratic societies. And as Ricardo noted: “We know that the concentration of wealth is associated with a massive concentration of power.”

Inequality militates against accountability, voice, democracy, and citizenship. The Ford Foundation’s President Darren Walker notes that political institutions dominated by elite interests undermine the promise of democracy. And he and Oxfam America's Nick Galasso point out that this inequality of power – the dominance of the wealthy over policymaking – contributes to other types of inequality. 

Absolute improvements distract us from inequality.

Both Ricardo Fuentes-Nieva and Carole Rakodi made this point. Yes, there have been massive improvements in life expectancy and the standard of living, and a secular decline in violence, and so forth. But as Carole Rakodi reminded us, focusing on the prosperity of cities is to miss the point because higher average incomes hide more extreme inequalities within urban areas. On top of that, inequality matters for the politics of development.

This is echoed in the IMF’s warning to governments everywhere that while policies need to be country-specific, the focus should be on raising the income share of the poor, and ensuring there is no ‘hollowing out’ of the middle class. Financial inclusion is imperative to tackle inequality in emerging and developing countries; and in advanced economies, policies should focus on raising human capital and skills and making tax systems more progressive.

Gender matters.

Three of our five speakers explicitly identified gender inequality as a (or the) key axis of inequality. With a little bit of canny, Paul Healey asked the audience: “How many of you are affected by gender inequality?” Almost everyone raised their hand. But we could make the same case for race, class, or the inequalities of a disabling environment – and the Ford Foundation does draw attention to all of these as key drivers of inequality, and also to dominant cultural narratives that exclude and generate intolerance of ‘other’ groups. 

Still, many of us generally don’t experience these other structural inequalities so directly. The OECD report tells us that the most measurable manifestation of this, the gender pay gap, is more than unfair – it impoverishes all society. If the gap in pay and economic participation hadn’t narrowed a little over the last quarter of a century, average income inequality would have increased yet further, by more than one Gini point.

Inequality means talking about the privileged, not just the poor.

Mariz Tadros was – thankfully – at pains to emphasise that inequality is relational and hierarchical. We do need to start by looking at the socially excluded, but this can reduce everything to the “poor, downtrodden, young adolescent girl in Yemen” and miss the role of politics and power. We need to ask how the powerful and the poor are related.

The OECD report makes it clear that redistribution is an essential and powerful tool for growth-focused governments who should focus on making sure the wealthy, both individuals and corporations, pay their fair share of the tax burden. The IMF presents incontrovertible evidence that when the share of the top 20% rises, as it has done steadily in recent decades, growth is lower, and more progressive taxes are the way forward.

And this is surely the point. Unlike inclusive growth, concerns about inequality force us to make much harder distributional decisions. 

 

Roundtable panel at The Politics of Inequality, DLP Annual Conference 2015

Politics of Inequality Roundtable panel, left to right: Samuel Hickey (Professor of Politics and Development and Joint Director of Research, ESID, University of Manchester); Ricardo Fuentes-Nieva (Head of Research, Oxfam GB); Carole Rakodi (Emeritus Professor, University of Birmingham); Chair Chris Roche (Director, Institute for Human Security and Social Change, La Trobe University); Paul Healey (Head of Profession, Social Development, DFID); and Mariz Tadros (Research Fellow, IDS)

See video clips from the roundtable and other speakers' presentations on the conference web page.

Image, top: A construction site in Bangalore (Photo: (NZ)Dave, Flickr)

0 Comments

Leave a comment

The views expressed in Opinions posts are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of DLP, the Australian Government or DLP's partner organisations.

Documents

Author

David Hudson

David Hudson

Dr David Hudson is a Senior Lecturer in Political Economy in the Department of Political Science at University College London (UCL). His main research interests lie in the political economy of development: public engagement with global poverty, the international political economy of development finance, and the politics of development.

Read more

Related items

Cancer and the links between medicine and development

Guest post for From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2015

Is developmental patrimonialism a dead end?

A few years ago I was involved in a research project that looked at state-business relations and economic growth in post-independence Africa. One of our findings was that several African states had been able to grow strongly, for 15 years or more, despite the absence of what most people would describe as ‘good governance’. In states such as Kenya, Malawi, and Côte d’Ivoire, post-independence strongmen, ‘fathers’ of their nations, had presided over strong growth by curtailing multi-party democracy, centralizing economic rents via the patronage system and carving out some space for long-term technocratic planning. We called this ‘developmental patrimonialism’. 

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th September 2016

Politics shape services; and services shape politics

How governance and sector specialists can help each other understand the politics of service delivery

Opinion by Richard Batley19th June 2014

What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

The political settlements framework can seem a distraction to some practitioners, many of whom have been thinking and working politically about development for a number of years. They find the term difficult to define with any precision and, in any case, quite unnecessary. In the real world, progress towards better understanding of and engagement with the political conditions which help and hinder development has been ticking along nicely, independently of the academic debates.

Opinion by Edward Laws15th July 2015

The Medellin model: don't forget the political processes

Since my DLP paper on Medellín was published, the city has become a ‘model’ for development – offering a palette of policies to combat urban violence that can provide a blueprint for cities with similar problems. 

Opinion by Kate Maclean2nd November 2015

Don't give up on government

The World Bank launched its flagship World Development Report (WDR) this week, which boldly redefines how governance and policy interact to yield good or bad development outcomes. People are rightly praising the report for rejecting best practicesembracing adaptation and endorsing a focus on politics.

Opinion by Dan Hymowitz3rd February 2017

Two remarkable transitions: lessons from Oman and Somaliland

We tend to look through the political settlements lens only at places experiencing either conflict or deep poverty – or both. Yet we would know much more about how useful the lens is if we examined more successes with it. Areas of stability and calm, especially in regions where near neighbours seem to be struggling to resolve strife, might teach us something about how historical experiences do or don’t chime with contemporary donor practices.

Opinion by Sarah Phillips20th July 2015

Where do inclusive institutions come from? Lessons from Asia

Inclusion is the new buzzword in international development. The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals are perhaps the most ambitious articulation of this consensus, with Goal 16 in particular calling for building more ‘effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels’.

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal27th February 2017
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal24th November 2014

Identifying rebels with a cause (and effect)

The Developmental Leadership Program will host its 2016 Annual Conference at La Trobe University in Melbourne on 8 February. Its theme is ‘Power, Politics and Positive Deviance’.

Opinion by Chris Roche1st December 2015

Politics, risk and development: three takeaways

Last week was a big one for the Australasian development community, particularly for those interested in the politics of development. The Australasian Aid Conference at the Australian National University (10-11 February) included a packed session on 'Putting political thinking into development practice'. And DLP’s Annual Conference at La Trobe University focused  on Power, Politics and Positive Deviance.

Opinion by Chris Roche19th February 2016

Forgotten South Sudan tangled in factionalism and failed politics

A toxic blend of complex historical identity politics and short-term elite politicking

Opinion by Jonathan Fisher4th September 2014

Uncounted: has the post-2015 data revolution failed already?

Counting matters. As the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi report puts it: What we measure affects what we do; and if our measurements are flawed, decisions may be distorted…. [I]f metrics of performance are flawed, so too may be inferences we draw.

Opinion by Alex Cobham12th May 2015

Political analysis as the practical art of the possible

Bringing politics back into PEA - a new paper with Adrian Leftwich

Opinion by David Hudson24th July 2014

What's so 'African' about African leadership?

I'm often guilty of describing myself as an 'Africanist' even though my research focuses only on Rwanda and the eastern DRC.

When I teach courses on African security, I focus on the 'important states' – Nigeria, South Africa, Kenya, and the 'significant conflicts' – Biafra, the Rwandan Genocide, Sierra Leone, Liberia, the Congo Wars, the Sudans and Darfur.

Opinion by Suda Perera1st April 2014

Somaliland's route to peace

Sarah Phillips explores Somaliland's approach to peacebuilding and asks if donors have overlooked the importance of secondary education in development.

Opinion by Sarah Phillips12th December 2013

More room for politics in the inequality debate?

This month at DLP our focus is largely on corruption as we prepare for a collaborative event in London discussing 'Corruption and development'. Yet we could hardly fail to notice that inequality, a hot topic since Pikettymania and the theme of our conference earlier in the year, has resurfaced with a vengeance.

Opinion by David Hudson24th June 2015

It's all about inclusion, but how?

Guest post for the World Bank

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal6th April 2016

The politics of redistribution: we need you

Which are the key country cases? Help us shape new research.

Opinion by David Hudson16th October 2014

Developmental leaders, 'dirty hands', and the dark side of collaboration

new analysis of poverty in India from the World Bank challenges claims that India's reforms and striking economic growth have failed to help the poor and disadvantaged. But the deprivation and inequalities in India (highlighted by Jean Drèze and Amartya Sen in An Uncertain Glory) are stark.

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi11th December 2013

Medellin - more than a miracle

Bad news sells. And for news editors looking for horror stories to recycle, Colombia's second largest city used to be a reliable source.

Opinion by Cheryl Stonehouse4th March 2014

Politics - the problem and solution to poor services?

One of the most influential and enduring World Development Reports ever produced – Making Services Work for Poor People – is a decade old this year.

Opinion by Claire Mcloughlin13th March 2014

Climate change and adaptation in the Pacific Islands: watering down women's security?

Beyond 'adaptability'? In this guest post, Nicole George highlights the work of women leaders who are challenging a narrow adaptation agenda.

Opinion by Nicole George7th March 2014

Connections, contradictions and the political economy of attention

How can we encourage creativity, even in risk-averse organisations? How can we protect our attention resources?

I listened to two interesting LSE podcasts recently which got me thinking more about creativity following on from a recent blog I posted about the current interest in innovation. Some even suggest the ‘innovation imperative’ is a mega trend.

Opinion by Chris Roche7th May 2015

Welcome to DLP's blog

Welcome to DLP's new blog on politics, power, policy and developmental leadership

Opinion by Heather Marquette10th December 2013

Adding gender and power to the TWP agenda

Thinking and Working Politically presents development to us as an endeavour embedded within power structures. This is so important.

It helps us see clearly that we need to understand domestic politics to deliver development outcomes. Who are the players? Who makes decisions? Who will stand to lose from a proposal and how can they block progress?

Opinion by Sally Moyle6th August 2015

What's in a name? Leadership as more than the 'big men' and 'big women' of history

When most people hear the term leadership, they think of 'The Leader', of the powerful CEO or the strong President (also, most likely, a man). This may be in part because the body of research into leadership is overwhelmingly dominated by the fields of business or organisational psychology. Or because the processes of leadership are often conflated with the actions or vision of a single leader.

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver11th February 2014

Political settlements: people and the landscapes of power

The problem with politics is that it involves people, and people do strange things. When development actors engage with power they often prefer to iron out the unpredictability of real politics in favour of the much neater lines of trends and social groups. We revere drivers of change studies because we can cope with the long-term, identity-based analysis of `deep’ politics. 

Opinion by Alan Whaites24th July 2015

Taking the Results agenda to the next level?

On new book The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development

Opinion by Chris Roche15th July 2015

Fiji's Roshika Deo - outlier, positive deviant or simply feisty feminist?

Guest blogger Priya Chattier speaks at DLP's 2016 Annual Conference at La Trobe University in Melbourne on Monday 8 February. Her post here begins a short series on the conference theme: Power, politics and positive deviance.

Opinion by Priya Chattier 1st February 2016

Why are Africa's poor more likely than the rich to pay a bribe for public services?

Research in Africa has consistently found that the poor are more likely than the better off to pay bribes to state officials for public services. This matters for all sorts of reasons, but from a state-building and developmental perspective, the crisis of trust that corruption can trigger can be devastating. When services are pushed just that bit further away by public-servants-turned-corrupt-gatekeepers, it is likely to colour the already jaundiced perceptions that hard-pressed communities may have of state institutions and of their legitimacy; and also, as Seligson puts it, of ‘the broader national governance frameworks in which they are located’.

Opinion by Caryn Peiffer19th January 2017

When the stars align to tackle inequality: reflections on the DLP annual conference

From the Occupy Movement to Thomas Piketty to current proposals for a new set of Sustainable Development Goals, inequality has emerged as one of the most intractable challenges of our time, and everyone, from activists to academics to policymakers, is talking about it. 

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal18th February 2015

Resources and reflections on gender and thinking and working politically

Next week's meeting of the Thinking and Working Politically Community of Practice will focus on gender at an opportune time. It follows a spate of interesting papers, blog posts and talks about the relationship between 'thinking and working politically' and gender issues. 

Opinion by Chris Roche12th June 2015

Gender - the power relationship that Political Economy Analysis forgot?

It's easy to forget that 'gender' does not mean 'women' but actually means 'gender relations', or the relations between men and women. Gender analysis examines how power is distributed between women and men, how it operates, who can use it and for what purposes. It's best understood as a system which shapes everything around us – what we think, what we know, whose knowledge is privileged, and which values are supported.

Opinion by Evie Browne13th February 2014

Parliamentary strengthening: the IDC report

Having presented evidence to the UK's International Development Committee, what of the final report?

Opinion by Tam O'Neil9th February 2015

Inequality – the politics behind the policies

Discussion starter for the #polinequality conference

Opinion by David Hudson11th February 2015

Gender and power: six links and one big opportunity

Donors have recently made great efforts to understand power in partner countries. Yet they have largely ignored one of the most pervasive power relations – gender.

Opinion by Diana Koester21st May 2015

DLP political settlements workshop: reflections

Serendipity, perhaps. I joined the Political Settlements Research Programme at the beginning of June; my first formal engagement was on June 17, at the Political Settlements Workshop organised by the Developmental Leadership Program. It was quite an induction day.

Opinion by Astrid Jamar22nd July 2015