Inequality - the politics behind the policies

11th February 2015

Professor Frances Stewart will open the DLP Annual Conference 2015 tomorrow with the second Adrian Leftwich Memorial Lecture.

This year we have invited speakers and delegates to consider the politics of inequality, and Professor Stewart is well known for her groundbreaking work on horizontal inequalities. Her lecture, 'Inequality, Justice and Policy', will examine what a just distribution might be, raising critical questions that go to the heart of the conference theme: questions about the inherent trade-offs involved – and about the politics of these trade-offs.

'... most discussions have not been genuinely about politics – in the sense of politics as a process, the play of power, and deliberation over contested visions of the good society.'

It would be flat wrong to claim that inequality has been kept off the agenda. We may have reservations or grumbles about how seriously inequality is taken: the relative prioritisation of growth, poverty and inequality; which type of inequality we should be most concerned with (wealth, income, gender, rights, access); how much inequality is 'okay'; or the role of private enterprise in closing or increasing gaps, to list just a few. Even so, from Piketty to the Palma, from the proposed SDG Goal 10 to Oxfam's 1 percent, the debate is vigorous.

But – and this is the theme of the conference – I do think most discussions have either been technical and economic, or focused on policies and on outcomes. They have not been genuinely about politics – in the sense of politics as a process, the play of power, and deliberation over desired but contested visions of the good society.

The interesting thing about inequality – as opposed to the more far-fetched fantasies of, say, inclusive growth or sustainable development, where all good things come together in a harmonious win-win – is that it forces us to make much harder distributional decisions.

Nepali woman spells out her call for equality (Photo: Stephan Bachenheimer / World Bank) Tackling inequality is not just growing the pie for everyone; it's about reallocating the slices. And this requires, dare I say, agency. It requires conscious deliberation by people – individually and collectively – to make sense of the social and political context they inhabit.

They then have to adopt, adapt or challenge existing social norms and power relations in a strategic attempt to realise these intentions. Those intentions may or may not be developmental. But that's politics. And there are losers as well as winners.

Most measurement discussions tend to be technical ones, yet how we measure inequality, and the inequality of what, are of course deeply political issues. Happily, Alex Cobham will be addressing precisely this issue with his paper 'Uncounted: Post-2015 and the politics of measurement'.

And in a similar way, the anti-politics machine haunts discussion of policies too. In addition to the technical concerns about impact and effectiveness, different policies clearly raise normative questions about the relative distribution of benefits and losses. Professor Stewart's lecture will address precisely this.

'We need to exert a good deal more effort grappling with the primary questions of how and why different policies are even possible.'

Perhaps even more important is to avoid obsessing about policy, and step back to consider the political context and process. A global wealth tax? Cash transfers or public works schemes? Pre-distribution such as land reform, minimum wage, or investment in education, skills and human capital? We need to exert a good deal more effort grappling with the primary questions of how and why different policies are even possible.

Happily, an international consensus is shifting from good governance to good enough governance, from first-best to second-best approaches, and towards 'politically smart, locally led' development. It is in this context that the conference participants will address how leaders and coalitions organise to create pressures for change. What role do power, ideas, coalitions, and critical junctures play? What's politically feasible in Brazil, Honduras, Indonesia, Rwanda, Myanmar, Nigeria or Rwanda?

What we know is that there is no magic bullet, no easy route to lowering inequality. Changing the status quo often requires a highly disruptive shock or crisis, or the building of some unsavoury alliances. And solving one problem can create another. For example, in Malaysia affirmative action policies that lowered inequality have produced tensions between ethnic groups.

This is why inequality is so intensely political. If there is a law of economics, it's surely not equilibrium but the 'Matthew effect': 'For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away'.

And if there's a role for politics, it is to collectively deliberate on an alternative distribution and to work politically to try and bring it about.

Images: Dhaka, Bangladesh (Laura Elizabeth Pohl / Bread for the World); A Nepali woman spells out her call for equality (Stephan Bachenheimer / World Bank)



David Hudson

18th February 2015 at 20:16

Yes indeed. I thought Abigail Hunt's talk was excellent. Plus, more encouragingly, gender inequality featured almost front and centre in the roundtable. Video and blog coming soon.


Evie Browne

11th February 2015 at 15:45

David, I do hope someone's going to talk about gender inequality in the conference! Other types of inequality may well have been discussed mostly in technical and economic terms, but discussions on gender (and other forms of social exclusion) have always been focused on the politics and power. Hope Abigail Hunt's talk provides some food for thought!

Leave a comment

The views expressed in Opinions posts are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of DLP, the Australian Government or DLP's partner organisations.



David Hudson

David Hudson

Dr David Hudson is a Senior Lecturer in Political Economy in the Department of Political Science at University College London (UCL). His main research interests lie in the political economy of development: public engagement with global poverty, the international political economy of development finance, and the politics of development.

Read more

Related items

Is developmental patrimonialism a dead end?

The first of two posts introducing a new DLP paper on growth and democratic transition

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th September 2016

Politics, risk and development: three takeaways

Reflections from two conferences

Opinion by Chris Roche19th February 2016

Inequality – the politics behind the policies

Discussion starter for the #polinequality conference

Opinion by David Hudson11th February 2015

What's in a name? Leadership as more than the 'big men' and 'big women' of history

Looking beyond 'The Leader' for a deeper understanding of how change happens

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver11th February 2014

Politics - the problem and solution to poor services?

Why - and how - does politics trump everything else in service delivery?

Opinion by Claire Mcloughlin13th March 2014

Political analysis as the practical art of the possible

Bringing politics back into PEA - a new paper with Adrian Leftwich

Opinion by David Hudson24th July 2014

Two remarkable transitions: lessons from Oman and Somaliland

Political settlements and international power structures

Opinion by Sarah Phillips20th July 2015

Adding gender and power to the TWP agenda

Why bring gender into Thinking and Working Politically?

Opinion by Sally Moyle6th August 2015

Cancer and the links between medicine and development

Guest post for From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2015

Medellin - more than a miracle

From the most murderous city on earth to 'a new global standard for urban policy': the politics of change in the wake of crisis

Opinion by Cheryl Stonehouse4th March 2014

Parliamentary strengthening: the IDC report

Having presented evidence to the UK's International Development Committee, what of the final report?

Opinion by Tam O'Neil9th February 2015
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal24th November 2014
Opinion by Dan Hymowitz3rd February 2017

Politics shape services; and services shape politics

How governance and sector specialists can help each other understand the politics of service delivery

Opinion by Richard Batley19th June 2014

Welcome to DLP's blog

Welcome to DLP's new blog on politics, power, policy and developmental leadership

Opinion by Heather Marquette10th December 2013

Fiji's Roshika Deo - outlier, positive deviant or simply feisty feminist?

First in a series on 'Power, politics and positive deviance', theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Priya Chattier 1st February 2016

What is transformative leadership?

Guest post in University World News

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2016

Forgotten South Sudan tangled in factionalism and failed politics

A toxic blend of complex historical identity politics and short-term elite politicking

Opinion by Jonathan Fisher4th September 2014

Identifying rebels with a cause (and effect)

'Power, politics and positive deviance' is the theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Chris Roche1st December 2015

Developmental leaders, 'dirty hands', and the dark side of collaboration

The ambiguities of supporting 'developmental leadership'

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi11th December 2013

The politics of redistribution: we need you

Which are the key country cases? Help us shape new research.

Opinion by David Hudson16th October 2014

The seeds and roots of change

Guest post on leadership networks for Governance for Development

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver1st December 2014

Taking the Results agenda to the next level?

On new book The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development

Opinion by Chris Roche15th July 2015
Opinion by Luke Arnold25th May 2016

It's all about inclusion, but how?

Guest post for the World Bank

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal6th April 2016

What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

The value of the political settlements framework

Opinion by Edward Laws15th July 2015

Climate change and adaptation in the Pacific Islands: watering down women's security?

How women leaders are challenging a narrow adaptation agenda.

Opinion by Nicole George7th March 2014

Gender - the power relationship that Political Economy Analysis forgot?

Why more questions about gender relations could help

Opinion by Evie Browne13th February 2014

Somaliland's route to peace

What can we learn from Somaliland's approach to peacebuilding? 

Opinion by Sarah Phillips12th December 2013
Opinion by Susy Ndaruhutse11th September 2014