Higher education in the post-2015 agenda: proof that it matters

11th September 2014

Higher education really matters. The evidence from our recent research into the links between education and developmental leadership shows that higher education can feed into political stability and civil engagement.

Primary education is, of course, critically important for poverty reduction. Yet poor governance, failing states and conflict are major destabilising forces in the development process, all of which undermine wider efforts at reducing poverty. A focus on poverty reduction alone is unlikely to produce sustainable development.

If we are to reduce poverty, then we also need sustainable approaches to governance, state-building and peace-building. Higher education is essential for the delivery of those approaches.

So it is disappointing that while the post-2015 education agenda focuses more strongly on quality and learning outcomes, it is still largely about primary education. Higher education does not appear to have a place at the table, despite its proven influence on wider governance, state-building and peace-building. Higher education can be a truly transformative investment in a country’s governance, developing leaders and coalitions that can build nations.

Along with colleagues at CfBT Education Trust, I have spent the last three years examining the contribution of higher education to good governance in developing countries, both globally and, most recently, in Ghana. I think it is worth setting out some of the evidence for a stronger focus on higher education in the post-2015 agenda that has emerged from my work for the Developmental Leadership Program and from other researchers in the field.

  • Significant social returns from higher education have a positive impact on governance. That impact may be direct, for instance through increased civic engagement; it may be indirect, through improved tax revenues, more entrepreneurship and job creation, increased charitable giving and community involvement and better social cohesion (Bloom et al., 2007; Heuser, 2007; Kellogg and Hervy, 2009).
  • The contribution education makes to economic growth has a significant influence on long-term transitions towards democratisation, greater respect for human rights and improved economic and political stability (McMahon, 2004).
  • Higher education encourages more pluralistic, open societies, argued the Task Force on Higher Education and Society at the turn of the millennium. Data from the World Values Survey a decade later showed that while nationality embeds fundamental values such as identity, higher education can play a significant role in broadening world views and, for instance, in challenging limited nationalistic assumptions (Welzel and Inglehart, 2010). This is particularly so if teaching methods encourage debate, critical thinking, meritocracy, tolerance and help develop positive leadership skills (Bloom et al., 2007; Heuser, 2007).
  • Higher education institutes help instil principles of good governance and democracy in students, and so promote positive citizenship. They are thought to do this by improving students’ cognitive skills, broadening their values and social connections and improving their economic standing (Welzel and Inglehart, 2008).
  • Through universities, students can form and interpret locally ideas about society, ethics, and political systems (The Task Force on Higher Education and Society, 2000).
  • Universities conduct research and analysis to help inform and improve social policy and governance (Bloom et al., 2007: 300).
  • Higher education institutes can develop a “critical mass” of individuals to support and encourage state-building processes and developmental outcomes (Holtland and Boeren, 2005). In Europe and the US, for instance, an educated middle class created state institutions and consolidated democratic processes (Kapur and Crowley, 2008).
  • Higher education is necessary to improve governance, although its ability to instil developmental values and attitudes depends on a number of factors: the courses and curricula offered, and whether they meet anticipated developmental needs; teaching methods and programme quality; links between a higher education institute and its society and economy; and how much emphasis is placed on social and cognitive development, rather than just the acquisition of skills and knowledge.
  • It is important that an institute’s management and operation reflects the skills it hopes to disseminate (Heuser, 2007), otherwise it may hinder the emergence of non-predatory elites. An institute’s governance issues, such as meritocracy, shared governance, transparency, accountability and academic freedom, are highly influential in the formation of graduates. Many of them may internalise and reflect these characteristics in their political, social and economic behaviour beyond higher education. Higher education institutes will also largely be a reflection of the society in which they are situated (The Task Force on Higher Education and Society, 2000).
  • Networking within institutes of higher education can create developmental coalitions that seek to transform their society for the better, as in Japan, South Korea, Botswana and Mauritius.
  • Secondary and higher education have played a key role in state-building processes in Ghana (Jones, Jones and Ndaruhutse, 2014).

The World Bank argued strongly more than a decade ago for an enhanced focus on tertiary education:

“The norms, values, attitudes and ethics that tertiary institutions impart to students are the foundation of the social capital necessary for constructing healthy civil societies and cohesive cultures—the very bedrock of good governance and democratic political systems…Through the transmission of democratic values and cultural norms, tertiary education contributes to the promotion of civic behaviours, nation building and social cohesion.”  (pp. 5, 31)

If we are to reduce poverty, then we also need sustainable approaches to governance, state-building and peace-building. Higher education is essential for the delivery of those approaches.

This means that higher education must take its rightful place alongside poverty reduction at the heart of the post-2015 agenda.

 

Originally posted on The Association of Commonwealth Universities’ website, The world beyond 2015: Is higher education ready?

Image: A university student who is earning her bachelor's degree (Photo: Gerhard Jörén / World Bank)

0 Comments

Leave a comment

The views expressed in Opinions posts are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of DLP, the Australian Government or DLP's partner organisations.

Author

Susy Ndaruhutse

Susy Ndaruhutse

Susy is Head of International Development and Education at CfBT Education Trust, where she is responsible for CfBT’s global work supporting education system reform. Her research and advisory work focuses on education policy, strategy and finance. She has a particular interest in how to support education in fragile and conflict-affected states, the post-2015 agenda and the way in which education can help contribute to wider objectives including good governance. 

Read more

Related items

Masculinity and sexual violence in India

Will the shocking Nirbaya case shift attitudes?

Opinion by Martin Rew16th September 2015
Opinion by Luke Arnold25th May 2016

Security and justice – the mismatch between policy and practice

What hinders more politically nuanced security and justice programming?

Opinion by Shivit Bakrania21st July 2014

Medellin - more than a miracle

From the most murderous city on earth to 'a new global standard for urban policy': the politics of change in the wake of crisis

Opinion by Cheryl Stonehouse4th March 2014

Is developmental patrimonialism a dead end?

The first of two posts introducing a new DLP paper on growth and democratic transition

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th September 2016

Identifying rebels with a cause (and effect)

'Power, politics and positive deviance' is the theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Chris Roche1st December 2015
Opinion by Heather Marquette9th March 2015

International donors - aiding or abetting?

The 'donor's dilemma' is discussed in a new DLP paper.

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi10th September 2015

‘Crows who come in search of dollars’: NGO legitimacy in conflict zones

Do political dynamics affect NGO legitimacy more than performance?

Opinion by Oliver Walton19th August 2014

Is education a magic bullet for addressing corruption? Insights from Papua New Guinea

This post for Devpolicy unpacks the findings of a new Development Policy Centre / DLP paper 

Opinion by Grant Walton17th June 2015

Authoritarianism, democracy and development

What does the evidence say?

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th November 2014

Pacific power: new femininities and women's leadership in the Pacific

The educated, internationally connected women who are changing the way 'development' is done

Opinion by Ceridwen Spark24th June 2014

Welcome to DLP's blog

Welcome to DLP's new blog on politics, power, policy and developmental leadership

Opinion by Heather Marquette10th December 2013

What's in a name? Leadership as more than the 'big men' and 'big women' of history

Looking beyond 'The Leader' for a deeper understanding of how change happens

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver11th February 2014
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal24th November 2014

Inclusive political settlements: who and what gets included, and how?

First of six posts on political settlements by researchers, policymakers and practitioners.

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal13th July 2015

The seeds and roots of change

Guest post on leadership networks for Governance for Development

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver1st December 2014

Education, development, and the problem with consensus

Why rethink the international consensus on 'quality basic education for development'?

Opinion by Michele Schweisfurth7th April 2014

The road to transparency in resource-rich Myanmar

Myanmar's EITI process and its contribution to broader reform

Opinion by Taylor Brown1st April 2016

Two remarkable transitions: lessons from Oman and Somaliland

Political settlements and international power structures

Opinion by Sarah Phillips20th July 2015

Neither 'good guys' nor 'bad guys': Positive engagement with armed groups

Final post in a series on 'Power, politics and positive deviance', theme of DLP's 2016 Annual Conference.

Opinion by Suda Perera5th February 2016
Opinion by Dan Hymowitz3rd February 2017

Parliamentary strengthening: the IDC report

Having presented evidence to the UK's International Development Committee, what of the final report?

Opinion by Tam O'Neil9th February 2015

Inequality – the politics behind the policies

Discussion starter for the #polinequality conference

Opinion by David Hudson11th February 2015

What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

The value of the political settlements framework

Opinion by Edward Laws15th July 2015

Corruption: is the right message getting through?

The unintended consequences of raising awareness of corruption

Opinion by Caryn Peiffer12th August 2015

It's all about inclusion, but how?

Guest post for the World Bank

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal6th April 2016

Political analysis as the practical art of the possible

Bringing politics back into PEA - a new paper with Adrian Leftwich

Opinion by David Hudson24th July 2014

The inclusiveness test: making change work

Guest post for openDemocracy

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal4th November 2015
Opinion by Susy Ndaruhutse11th September 2014

What is transformative leadership?

Guest post in University World News

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2016

Somaliland's route to peace

What can we learn from Somaliland's approach to peacebuilding? 

Opinion by Sarah Phillips12th December 2013

Indonesia and the political settlements trap

The challenges of 'resettling the settlement'

Opinion by Graham Teskey17th July 2015

Does talking about corruption make it seem worse?

Guest post for The Guardian's Global Development Professionals Network

Opinion by Suda Perera19th December 2016

The challenge of realising Pacific democracies' development potential

How can Pacific democracies deliver for their citizens?

Opinion by Julien Barbara8th July 2016

Politics - the problem and solution to poor services?

Why - and how - does politics trump everything else in service delivery?

Opinion by Claire Mcloughlin13th March 2014
Opinion by Caryn Peiffer5th February 2015

Innovation: transactional or transformative?

Given the fascination with 'innovation' in the field of development, it's time to discuss what the word might mean.

Opinion by Chris Roche23rd March 2015

Developmental leadership: putting inclusiveness first

Inclusiveness should be the first step towards building more robust states.

Opinion by Seth D. Kaplan24th September 2015