Don't give up on government

3rd February 2017

The World Bank launched its flagship World Development Report (WDR) this week, which boldly redefines how governance and policy interact to yield good or bad development outcomes. People are rightly praising the report for rejecting best practices, embracing adaptation and endorsing a focus on politics.

...if development organizations step back from supporting governments, it will be citizens around the world who lose out.

However, my concern is the report, in combination with a recent paper by Stuti Khemani and Shanta Devarajan which was influential in the WDR’s analysis, could accelerate the current development focus on seeking to control rather than energize government. If we do that, we’re unlikely to see the good governance revolution needed to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

The WDR hinges on a complex analysis of politics, including a thorough examination of how elite bargains take shape and evolve. The main ‘entry points’ for development organizations, the WDR argues, are to shift the rules of the game around those bargains or to support citizens to be ‘agents of change’.

But in the experience of my organization, the Tony Blair Africa Governance Initiative (AGI), we’ve found as we’ve worked with governments that politics is a complex mix of ‘power, interests, agency, ideas, building coalitions’. This means, counterintuitively, that there are actually more entry points for international actors than just rectifying political market failures. So I agree with Brian Levy’s critique that the WDR gives too limited airtime to ‘how it might be possible to achieve some development gains in difficult governance environments – taking a short-to-medium-term perspective, and without necessarily transforming the broader governance environment.’

Development organizations can support these gains – with the right approaches. AGI’s recent paper, Shoulder to Shoulder, offers a few reflections about what it takes for international organizations to do politically savvy work with governments.

Spend time with people

Kudos to the WDR for advocating a deeper understanding of domestic politics through the use of approaches like game theory and political economy analysis. But while these are critical they’re not sufficient. If individuals and coalitions have agency in government, then we also need to understand people. Research and reading alone can’t achieve this. It requires international development staff getting to know key people who hold political power – their personalities, agendas and what ‘makes them tick’ – by actually spending time with them.

Facilitate and broker

If we development organizations default to the view that governance and politics are a ‘problem’ to be fixed in order to ‘overcome obstacles in the policy arena’, that leads us to see our role as influencing government to improve what it does. But working collaboratively with government can be more effective. 

For instance, in 2012, progress in Rwanda’s energy sector was being held back because the government had set an overly ambitious goal of generating 1000 megawatts of power by 2020. This led to an inability to prioritize and a failure to secure private investment.

Solar power plant in Rwanda (AGI)AGI worked with Rwanda's Ministries of Energy and Finance along with the energy utility and President’s Office on a cross-government demand forecasting exercise. The process took a long time but, because it was genuinely participatory, the result was these key government institutions jointly agreeing to a significantly reduced target. Several other development partners had previously commissioned consultancies to produce reports to criticize the government's 1000 megawatt goal, but it was a process that worked in alignment with government politics that led to real change.

Since the target reduction, Rwanda has been able to prioritize, leading to 150 megawatts of new generation financed by the private sector. Rwanda now has three times more electricity available than it did in 2012.

Hire people who can work in these ways

The WDR notes that some development organizations are implementing ‘internal reforms as they seek more agile, more flexible, and more adaptive projects’. That’s excellent news. For this to work, however, organizations must have staff with the right skills and approaches: the ability to build trusted relationships, to be resilient and adaptive, and to work within local culture.

How do you make sure you have staff with these subtle but essential abilities and ways of working? This is hard to teach, so at AGI we put a lot of effort into hiring people who already have these capabilities and approaches; for example, we use interactive case studies during interviews. We’ve also developed a learning program called ‘CraftWork’ which aims to improve our staff’s ability to understand and navigate political environments through activities ranging from coaching to team-based problem-solving sessions.

The 2017 WDR offers a compelling new framework for governance. But if a result of the report is development organizations stepping back from supporting governments, it will be citizens around the world who lose out.

 

Images: Power in the city (J Endres); a new solar power plant in Rwanda (AGI).

0 Comments

Leave a comment

The views expressed in Opinions posts are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of DLP, the Australian Government or DLP's partner organisations.

Documents

Author

Dan Hymowitz

Dan Hymowitz

Dan Hymowitz is a Senior Advisor with the Tony Blair Africa Governance Initiative.

Read more

Related items

Education, development, and the problem with consensus

Why rethink the international consensus on 'quality basic education for development'?

Opinion by Michele Schweisfurth7th April 2014
Opinion by Luke Arnold25th May 2016
Opinion by Dan Hymowitz3rd February 2017

Medellin - more than a miracle

From the most murderous city on earth to 'a new global standard for urban policy': the politics of change in the wake of crisis

Opinion by Cheryl Stonehouse4th March 2014

The road to transparency in resource-rich Myanmar

Myanmar's EITI process and its contribution to broader reform

Opinion by Taylor Brown1st April 2016

Identifying rebels with a cause (and effect)

'Power, politics and positive deviance' is the theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Chris Roche1st December 2015
Opinion by Susy Ndaruhutse11th September 2014

International donors - aiding or abetting?

The 'donor's dilemma' is discussed in a new DLP paper.

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi10th September 2015
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal29th March 2016

Is education a magic bullet for addressing corruption? Insights from Papua New Guinea

This post for Devpolicy unpacks the findings of a new Development Policy Centre / DLP paper 

Opinion by Grant Walton17th June 2015

Authoritarianism, democracy and development

What does the evidence say?

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th November 2014

Adding gender and power to the TWP agenda

Why bring gender into Thinking and Working Politically?

Opinion by Sally Moyle6th August 2015

Somaliland's route to peace

What can we learn from Somaliland's approach to peacebuilding? 

Opinion by Sarah Phillips12th December 2013

Politics shape services; and services shape politics

How governance and sector specialists can help each other understand the politics of service delivery

Opinion by Richard Batley19th June 2014

Two remarkable transitions: lessons from Oman and Somaliland

Political settlements and international power structures

Opinion by Sarah Phillips20th July 2015

Politics - the problem and solution to poor services?

Why - and how - does politics trump everything else in service delivery?

Opinion by Claire Mcloughlin13th March 2014

The politics of redistribution: we need you

Which are the key country cases? Help us shape new research.

Opinion by David Hudson16th October 2014

Gender - the power relationship that Political Economy Analysis forgot?

Why more questions about gender relations could help

Opinion by Evie Browne13th February 2014

Politics, risk and development: three takeaways

Reflections from two conferences

Opinion by Chris Roche19th February 2016

Parliamentary strengthening: the IDC report

Having presented evidence to the UK's International Development Committee, what of the final report?

Opinion by Tam O'Neil9th February 2015

Forgotten South Sudan tangled in factionalism and failed politics

A toxic blend of complex historical identity politics and short-term elite politicking

Opinion by Jonathan Fisher4th September 2014

Do donors have realistic expectations of their staff when it comes to 'thinking and working politically'?

Is learning to ‘think politically’ like learning a new language? 

Opinion by Heather Marquette9th June 2014

Developmental leaders, 'dirty hands', and the dark side of collaboration

The ambiguities of supporting 'developmental leadership'

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi11th December 2013

It's all about inclusion, but how?

Guest post for the World Bank

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal6th April 2016

Taking the Results agenda to the next level?

On new book The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development

Opinion by Chris Roche15th July 2015

Gender analysis, and thinking and working politically – bridging the gap

Guest post on Devpolicy  introducing panels at this week's Australasian Aid Conference

Opinion by Chris Roche14th February 2017

Innovation: transactional or transformative?

Given the fascination with 'innovation' in the field of development, it's time to discuss what the word might mean.

Opinion by Chris Roche23rd March 2015

Inclusive political settlements: who and what gets included, and how?

First of six posts on political settlements by researchers, policymakers and practitioners.

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal13th July 2015

Political analysis as the practical art of the possible

Bringing politics back into PEA - a new paper with Adrian Leftwich

Opinion by David Hudson24th July 2014
Opinion by Heather Marquette10th November 2014

Is developmental patrimonialism a dead end?

The first of two posts introducing a new DLP paper on growth and democratic transition

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th September 2016

Fiji's Roshika Deo - outlier, positive deviant or simply feisty feminist?

First in a series on 'Power, politics and positive deviance', theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Priya Chattier 1st February 2016

Welcome to DLP's blog

Welcome to DLP's new blog on politics, power, policy and developmental leadership

Opinion by Heather Marquette10th December 2013
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal24th November 2014

Inequality – the politics behind the policies

Discussion starter for the #polinequality conference

Opinion by David Hudson11th February 2015

What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

The value of the political settlements framework

Opinion by Edward Laws15th July 2015

The challenge of realising Pacific democracies' development potential

How can Pacific democracies deliver for their citizens?

Opinion by Julien Barbara8th July 2016

Cancer and the links between medicine and development

Guest post for From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2015

Corruption: is the right message getting through?

The unintended consequences of raising awareness of corruption

Opinion by Caryn Peiffer12th August 2015

What's in a name? Leadership as more than the 'big men' and 'big women' of history

Looking beyond 'The Leader' for a deeper understanding of how change happens

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver11th February 2014

Security and justice – the mismatch between policy and practice

What hinders more politically nuanced security and justice programming?

Opinion by Shivit Bakrania21st July 2014