DLP political settlements workshop: reflections

22nd July 2015

Serendipity, perhaps. I joined the Political Settlements Research Programme at the beginning of June; my first formal engagement was on June 17, at the Political Settlements Workshop organised by the Developmental Leadership Program. It was quite an induction day.

I found myself catapulted straight into policy-oriented debates about political settlements and in just one day, I got the chance to meet a rich variety of researchers and practitioners. Of course, many of the world’s key researchers on political settlements were there – but there were also a lot of practitioners, all keen to discuss power bargaining processes and, more importantly, willing to plan and deliver aid policies differently.

How do we see and relate to power given its murky and intangible nature? How do we make a framework flexible enough to fit into technocratic structures without it becoming no more than a technocratic exercise?

It was clear from the start that the aim of the workshop was to support and develop research and thinking about politics and institutional dynamics, but also to make all of this relevant for policy and practice. It was a wonderfully interactive workshop, fully focused on how and why the concept of political settlements is useful.

At my table, we grappled first-hand with the difficulties of finding a useful definition that integrated all necessary dimensions without losing the integrity of the term ‘political settlements’. During the day, experts from around the world told us how they had applied political settlements analyses in regions such as Somaliland, Oman, Myanmar, Mexico, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

And then, again, we had an opportunity to do rather than listen, trying to apply the approach to Lacandonia. Lacandonia was the life-sized first aid practice dummy of our workshop; a fictional nation marked by violence and citizen dissatisfaction with limited governance capacities. Through all these participative learning activities, we were encouraged to test for ourselves the potential benefits and challenges of using hands-on political settlements approaches.

It seemed to me that all my fellow participants fully accepted that the underlying power relations in the contexts in which they intervene are critically important and should be understood as clearly as possible. At the same time, they were keen-sighted about the possible pitfalls of translating this into policy and practice.

Our discussions identified a number of tensions that need to be balanced: stability versus ethics; legitimacy versus confidence; inclusion versus exclusion; the role of civil society; and economic distribution and redistribution. We considered all these elements, asking what their capacity was to enhance change while – hopefully – avoiding violent conflicts. In other words, the sessions encouraged us to look at the role international donors might play in identifying incentives for wider inclusion processes.

And yet, it seemed, there was a general consensus that without any clear or generally agreed definition of what ‘political settlements’ are, it is likely to be difficult to assess how useful the approach might be.

To conclude the day, two practitioners told us frankly what they thought.

The first mused about how political settlements analysis could possibly offer a magic solution to the challenges donors face. He wondered whether political settlements analyses might actually confuse matters and, in practice, would do little to help donors formulate real-world plans. They might instead lose sight of the need to maintain focus on the ‘messy’ facts that generally characterise power dynamics. 

I see this workshop as a crucial staging post which ... pushed thinking about political settlements a few more steps forward.

The second commentator put her concerns into one sentence: “Political settlements are intuitively attractive, but I would never use the concept in meetings with HoMs [Head of Mission of Embassy] – because we cannot explain it.”

And in the same spirit, on my way back home to Edinburgh I found myself wondering how the intangible nature of power can be discussed and included in a policy framework, particularly given the current structures of aid delivery, which really aren’t designed to make room for such factors.

How do we see and relate to power given its murky and intangible nature? How do we make a framework flexible enough to fit into technocratic structures without it becoming no more than a technocratic exercise?

And this, for me, was the whole point of a most valuable workshop. These are difficult questions that must be faced up to, but they can only be dealt with through engaged discussions with practitioners and through our own continuing, consistent attempts to consider, approach and deliver aid in alternative ways. I see this workshop as a crucial staging post which brought together all those who are struggling with these questions and pushed thinking about political settlements a few more steps forward.

See more posts on political settlements by researchers, policy-makers and practitioners

Image: 'Negotiation' (Photo: Georgie Pauwels, Flickr)


Leave a comment

The views expressed in Opinions posts are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of DLP, the Australian Government or DLP's partner organisations.



Astrid Jamar

Astrid Jamar

Astrid Jamar works with the Political Settlements Research Programme at the University of Edinburgh. She has been researching transitional justice in Rwanda and Burundi since 2006 for her PhD thesis, Transitional Justice Battlefield - An Aidnography of Practitioners' Everyday Experiences in Burundi and Rwanda.

Read more

Related items

Two remarkable transitions: lessons from Oman and Somaliland

Political settlements and international power structures

Opinion by Sarah Phillips20th July 2015

Developmental leaders, 'dirty hands', and the dark side of collaboration

The ambiguities of supporting 'developmental leadership'

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi11th December 2013

Shuffling the decks: quick fixes versus long-term stability

Guest post for Development Progress on 'post-conflict' DRC

Opinion by Suda Perera22nd January 2015

What's in a name? Leadership as more than the 'big men' and 'big women' of history

Looking beyond 'The Leader' for a deeper understanding of how change happens

Opinion by Heather Lyne de Ver11th February 2014
Opinion by Heather Marquette10th November 2014

Developmental leadership: putting inclusiveness first

Inclusiveness should be the first step towards building more robust states.

Opinion by Seth D. Kaplan24th September 2015

The challenge of realising Pacific democracies' development potential

How can Pacific democracies deliver for their citizens?

Opinion by Julien Barbara8th July 2016

Cancer and the links between medicine and development

Guest post for From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th April 2015

Somaliland's route to peace

What can we learn from Somaliland's approach to peacebuilding? 

Opinion by Sarah Phillips12th December 2013

Medellin - more than a miracle

From the most murderous city on earth to 'a new global standard for urban policy': the politics of change in the wake of crisis

Opinion by Cheryl Stonehouse4th March 2014

The inclusiveness test: making change work

Guest post for openDemocracy

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal4th November 2015
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal26th April 2016

Parliamentary strengthening: the IDC report

Having presented evidence to the UK's International Development Committee, what of the final report?

Opinion by Tam O'Neil9th February 2015

What do we do on Monday? Political settlements in theory and practice

The value of the political settlements framework

Opinion by Edward Laws15th July 2015
Opinion by Dan Hymowitz3rd February 2017

Do donors have realistic expectations of their staff when it comes to 'thinking and working politically'?

Is learning to ‘think politically’ like learning a new language? 

Opinion by Heather Marquette9th June 2014

The road to transparency in resource-rich Myanmar

Myanmar's EITI process and its contribution to broader reform

Opinion by Taylor Brown1st April 2016

Politics, risk and development: three takeaways

Reflections from two conferences

Opinion by Chris Roche19th February 2016

Education, development, and the problem with consensus

Why rethink the international consensus on 'quality basic education for development'?

Opinion by Michele Schweisfurth7th April 2014

Welcome to DLP's blog

Welcome to DLP's new blog on politics, power, policy and developmental leadership

Opinion by Heather Marquette10th December 2013

Corruption: is the right message getting through?

The unintended consequences of raising awareness of corruption

Opinion by Caryn Peiffer12th August 2015

Taking the Results agenda to the next level?

On new book The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development

Opinion by Chris Roche15th July 2015

Being 'there': reflections on fieldwork in the DRC

Fieldwork in fragile places part 1: the security dilemma

Opinion by Suda Perera5th November 2014

Gender - the power relationship that Political Economy Analysis forgot?

Why more questions about gender relations could help

Opinion by Evie Browne13th February 2014

Being 'there': Bermuda Triangulation

Fieldwork in fragile places part 2: data difficulties

Opinion by Suda Perera6th November 2014
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal29th March 2016

Security and justice – the mismatch between policy and practice

What hinders more politically nuanced security and justice programming?

Opinion by Shivit Bakrania21st July 2014

Indonesia and the political settlements trap

The challenges of 'resettling the settlement'

Opinion by Graham Teskey17th July 2015

Innovation: transactional or transformative?

Given the fascination with 'innovation' in the field of development, it's time to discuss what the word might mean.

Opinion by Chris Roche23rd March 2015

Climate change and adaptation in the Pacific Islands: watering down women's security?

How women leaders are challenging a narrow adaptation agenda.

Opinion by Nicole George7th March 2014

Is education a magic bullet for addressing corruption? Insights from Papua New Guinea

This post for Devpolicy unpacks the findings of a new Development Policy Centre / DLP paper 

Opinion by Grant Walton17th June 2015

Inclusive political settlements: who and what gets included, and how?

First of six posts on political settlements by researchers, policymakers and practitioners.

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal13th July 2015
Opinion by Luke Arnold25th May 2016

Authoritarianism, democracy and development

What does the evidence say?

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th November 2014

Identifying rebels with a cause (and effect)

'Power, politics and positive deviance' is the theme of DLP's 2016 annual conference.

Opinion by Chris Roche1st December 2015

Political analysis as the practical art of the possible

Bringing politics back into PEA - a new paper with Adrian Leftwich

Opinion by David Hudson24th July 2014

Forgotten South Sudan tangled in factionalism and failed politics

A toxic blend of complex historical identity politics and short-term elite politicking

Opinion by Jonathan Fisher4th September 2014

International donors - aiding or abetting?

The 'donor's dilemma' is discussed in a new DLP paper.

Opinion by Niheer Dasandi10th September 2015

Overcoming premature evaluation

Guest post in From Poverty to Power

Opinion by Chris Roche15th November 2016

It's all about inclusion, but how?

Guest post for the World Bank

Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal6th April 2016

Adding gender and power to the TWP agenda

Why bring gender into Thinking and Working Politically?

Opinion by Sally Moyle6th August 2015

Is developmental patrimonialism a dead end?

The first of two posts introducing a new DLP paper on growth and democratic transition

Opinion by Tim Kelsall27th September 2016

Inequality – the politics behind the policies

Discussion starter for the #polinequality conference

Opinion by David Hudson11th February 2015
Opinion by Heather Marquette9th March 2015
Opinion by Susy Ndaruhutse11th September 2014
Opinion by Alina Rocha Menocal24th November 2014

Gender analysis, and thinking and working politically – bridging the gap

Guest post on Devpolicy  introducing panels at this week's Australasian Aid Conference

Opinion by Chris Roche14th February 2017

‘Crows who come in search of dollars’: NGO legitimacy in conflict zones

Do political dynamics affect NGO legitimacy more than performance?

Opinion by Oliver Walton19th August 2014

The politics of redistribution: we need you

Which are the key country cases? Help us shape new research.

Opinion by David Hudson16th October 2014